Source of this article and featured image is TechCrunch. Description and key fact are generated by Codevision AI system.
Meta successfully defended itself in a U.S. antitrust trial against the FTC, with a federal judge rejecting claims of monopolistic practices. The court ruled the FTC failed to prove Meta violated antitrust laws during its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. Evidence showed Meta’s past concerns about Instagram’s growth, but the judge emphasized current market competition like TikTok. The case highlights shifting dynamics in social media platforms and regulatory challenges. Amanda Silberling’s report details the legal arguments and historical context of the dispute.
Key facts
- Meta won a U.S. antitrust trial where a federal judge denied claims of monopolistic behavior.
- The FTC could not prove Meta violated antitrust laws during its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp.
- Internal emails revealed Meta’s past worries about Instagram’s rapid growth and competitive threat.
- Judge Boasberg noted the evolving market landscape, citing TikTok as evidence of ongoing competition.
- The ruling underscores changes in social media dynamics since the FTC’s initial lawsuit five years ago.
