Source of this article and featured image is Wired AI. Description and key fact are generated by Codevision AI system.
Adrienne So reviews Fitbit’s new AI Health Coach, highlighting its potential and limitations. She used the public preview for three weeks, aiming to improve her running pace but found the AI’s advice sometimes misguided. While the Coach offered personalized workout plans, it struggled with contextual understanding, like misjudging her schedule. The author notes that real human interaction provides better feedback and motivation than an AI. Ultimately, she concludes that friends and real-life connections are more effective for fitness goals than an AI coach.
Key facts
- Adrienne So tested Fitbit’s AI Health Coach for three weeks to improve her running performance.
- The AI struggled with contextual understanding, such as misinterpreting her schedule as a work conference.
- Fitbit’s Coach lacks features like menstrual health tracking and advanced running metrics for Pixel Watch users.
- The AI’s recommendations, while helpful, raised privacy concerns about sharing sensitive health data with a corporate entity.
- The author found human interaction more effective for motivation and real-time feedback than AI-generated advice.
